Not every issue deserves the same urgency
An expiring certificate next month and a site that's down right now are both "issues," but they don't belong on the same priority level.
Website Risk Dashboard
Website Risk Dashboard
MonitorMojo provides a website risk dashboard that tracks all the signals that affect visitor experience. See uptime, SSL, response time, security headers, and domain risk from one view.
No credit card required · Dashboard-first checks · Run real website checks
Example check preview
Website health signals, not live monitoring data
Website reachableok
HTTPS activeok
Response time signalreview
SSL/domain notereview
Risk summaryreview
The Problem
Small misses turn into public failures fast.
A flat list of problems doesn't say what to do first
Without some sense of severity, a list of check results just becomes another thing to triage manually.
Risk compounds across a portfolio
One certificate expiring soon is manageable. Ten certificates expiring across different client sites, unprioritized, is not.
How It Works
1
Add your domain
Enter the website, subdomain, or client property you need to protect.
2
MonitorMojo checks it
Run a real reachability, HTTPS/SSL, response time, and configured health check.
3
Review what needs attention
Use the returned signals to decide what to fix before a browser error or complaint.
Features
Website health checks built for the signals teams forget until they hurt.
priority_high
Risk-oriented view
See which sites and signals need attention soonest, not just a flat pass/fail list.
domain
Domain and certificate risk together
See expiring domains and certificates side by side, since both cause the same kind of sudden outage.
verified_user
Full signal context
Reachability, SSL, response time, and security headers all feed into the same risk picture.
event
Time-based urgency
Certificate and domain risk are naturally time-bound, so the dashboard reflects how much runway is actually left.
api
API access
Pull risk data into your own prioritization or alerting workflow.
search_check
Triage, not just detection
Move from "here's what's wrong" to "here's what needs attention first."
Who This Is For
Built for teams closest to the website.
Agencies managing many client sites
Prioritize which client site needs attention first when several have open issues.
Website maintenance teams
Turn a portfolio of check results into a manageable, prioritized task list.
IT consultants
Give a mixed portfolio of client infrastructure a consistent risk lens.
Why MonitorMojo
Simple checks for real website risk.
Built around urgency, not just status
The dashboard is designed to answer "what needs attention first," not just "what's currently broken."
Credit-based pricing
Track risk across a growing portfolio without a flat per-site monitoring fee.
Time-aware by nature
Certificate and domain expiry are inherently time-bound risks, and the dashboard reflects that instead of treating every issue the same.
Workflow Guide
What this workflow means
Website risk dashboard that tracks uptime, SSL certificates, response time, security headers, and domain risk to provide a complete picture of website health risks.
In practice, that means reviewing SSL certificate status, certificate expiry windows, renewal ownership, and post-renewal confirmation from one repeatable process instead of waiting for web agencies and client-services teams to hear about a problem secondhand. A check can show whether a URL is reachable, whether SSL appears valid, how quickly the server responds, and whether selected headers are present — it does not replace a security audit or an incident-response team, but it makes the underlying signals visible before they turn into a bigger issue.
Who should use this
This is built for web agencies and client-services teams — specifically for the moment of reviewing a client portfolio before a monthly report. An expiring certificate next month and a site that's down right now are both "issues," but they don't belong on the same priority level. The same workflow is reusable by anyone with a public URL tied to revenue, leads, or reputation.
Detailed step-by-step workflow
Start by listing the URLs that actually matter for reviewing a client portfolio before a monthly report — not every page on the site, just the ones tied to revenue, signups, or trust. Define the check types for each: reachability, HTTP status, HTTPS/SSL status and expiry window, response time, redirects, and security header presence.
Set a cadence that matches the risk: a monthly review for low-traffic pages, a check right after every deploy for anything tied to revenue. When something fails, triage before assuming cause — hosting, DNS, SSL, code, cache, or a third-party script could all be responsible. Record an owner and a next review date, then re-check after the fix ships.
Checklist and template
Use this template for every review: [URL], [Check Type], [Status], [Issue], [Priority], [Owner], [Detected Date], [Next Review Date]. Describe what the check observed before assigning a root cause — 'response time increased' is a fact, 'hosting is the problem' is a guess until confirmed.
For a recurring report, group findings by reachability, SSL, response time, and security headers, and say plainly when a signal showed no issue rather than implying full coverage.
Common mistakes
The most common miss for web agencies and client-services teams is checking only the homepage while a checkout, signup, or booking flow silently breaks. A close second is assuming SSL auto-renewal always works — it can fail quietly, and an external check is the only way to catch it before a browser warning does. The biggest framing mistake is treating one clean check as proof the whole site is covered.
Practical example
Picture reviewing a client portfolio before a monthly report. A scheduled check flags that a key page is slower than its usual baseline and a security header is missing. See which sites and signals need attention soonest, not just a flat pass/fail list. Instead of guessing, the team logs the observation, assigns an owner, and re-checks after the fix — turning "something feels off" into a closed-loop task with a timestamp attached.
How MonitorMojo helps
MonitorMojo runs the checks behind website risk dashboard — reachability, SSL, response time, and security headers — from one dashboard, with an API and CLI for teams that want it scripted into an existing workflow. Credit-based checks make it practical to run a review exactly when it matters: before a client call, after a deploy, or the moment someone asks whether the site is healthy.
FAQ
Questions teams ask before they check website health.
How is a risk dashboard different from a simple status list?
A status list shows pass/fail per site. A risk view adds urgency — an expiring certificate and an active outage aren't equally pressing, and the dashboard reflects that difference.
Does this cover domain expiration risk, not just SSL?
Yes. Domain and certificate risk are shown together, since either one expiring can take a site offline the same way.
How do I prioritize across many client sites?
The dashboard is built to surface which sites carry the most time-sensitive risk first, rather than requiring you to review every site individually to figure that out.
Can I pull risk data into my own workflow?
Yes. A public API is available for retrieving risk and check data programmatically. Documentation is available at /api-docs.
How does pricing scale for tracking risk across a portfolio?
MonitorMojo uses credit-based pricing — you pay for checks you run, which scales naturally with portfolio size. View current rates at /pricing.